Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Sourcery and Pyramids by Terry Pratchett
Julie Paradox put in a request for Sourcery, and then went for Pyramids instead. I thought it might be fun to do both together.
So, here's Sourcery:
And here's Pyramids:
Interestingly different, yet fundamentally similar sentences.
Sourcery's first sentence is bold in its simplicity. Not even stopping for a 'once upon a time', it goes straight into a direct, monosyllabic statement: 'There was a man.' We hear nothing of his name, place, character or life: his mere existence is the substance of a story. This is fairy-tale logic - especially when the sentence adds the number of sons - but fairy-tale stripped of its traditional 'once upon a time' flourish. Pared-down fairy-tale, in other words; down-to-earth fairy-tale; fairy-tale stripped down to common humanity. Pratchett often makes a theme of the ordinary man (and, less often, the ordinary woman), and this stylistic bluntness prepares the way: we are to see the mundane humanity in the context of the mythical.
There is no such bluntness in the opening of Pyramids. In terms of style, Pratchett is more or less showing off here with his bathetic bump from the epic drama of 'nothing but stars' to the sudden hop from the divine to the ridiculous - or at least to the quotidian. In positing a Creator with a windscreen, Pratchett asserts his characteristic style in which he helps himself to analogies that would be foreign to his characters, while also cocking a snook at reverence: a Creator who can't be bothered is a clear declaration that we are in a comic universe. The sentence is elaborately, almost heavy-handedly comedic, the kind of sentence a publisher very much hopes will grab the attention of a casual bookshop browser; it's also a sentence that quickly lays out the stall. We are reading a book aimed at a modern reader that will touch upon metaphysics with a gadfly lightness.
What can we see in common with these sentences? Well, one of the major commonalities is that they turn and look the reader in the eye. 'There was a man' is the writer informing rather than evoking; windscreens and Creators assure us that we'll be looking at the universe through, as it were, our own, human-eye-level windscreen. In both cases, the overriding tone is conspiratorial.
At the same time, their scope is broad: the audience may be our ordinary selves, and the universe may centre on equally ordinary people, but myths and divinity are not beyond our reach. In fact, far from being beyond our reach, they are being brought down to our level. We can accept that the existence of a mythical man is important without needing a 'Once upon a time' to ease us into it; we can laugh at a wild night sky with a careless Creator. Pratchett at once appeals to and flatters his audience's intelligence. The universe is a joke, and we will be in on it.
Terry Pratchett is an author who begins with bold sweeps, often starting in the heavens or ranging over a whole city or country before narrowing in on his central characters. Beginning with a sentence that grabs the readers' attention with its eccentricity is often a successful strategy, commercially as much as artistically (Iain Banks is a notable example), and a common feature is that the style tends to settle down once the story begins. There is a limit to how much you can tell readers about the actual events of the plot when you're in the realm of the mythic - or at least, there's a limit if you're going to make your story about ordinary people and tell it in a chatty, colloquial tone as Pratchett does.
As a result, Pratchett's opening sentences are often, in terms of storytelling, skippable. While they vary in content, they tend to have a single declaration: You are reading a Terry Pratchett novel. Humour, irreverence, metaphysics and myth are going to be featured, and we'll get to the plot in a minute. I said in my discussion of Jane Eyre that some books begin with a handshake, and Pratchett takes this a step further: in effect, his first sentences are secret handshakes. Open secrets, secrets that the reader can work out by getting the joke - as I said, one of Pratchett's main charms is that he makes the reader feel clever - but coded handshakes nonetheless. You shake the sentence's hand, and then you get admitted into the clubhouse.
I would note an interesting fact here: Pratchett is a writer who tends to elicit strong positive or negative reactions, and the negative reactors often plough down in the first few pages. The first couple of times I tried his books, this is how I reacted; I found the beginnings repetitive and mannered, and it was only when I persevered into the plot that I started enjoying it - and subsequently developed some appreciation of his openings. Other readers, I think, delight in the sense of 'Welcome back!' that his sentences create, the way they invite a sense of membership. Pratchett is an author unusually able to establish a sense of friendship with his readers - not necessarily in terms of how he behaves in person (though I get the impression he's a pretty friendly chap), but by establishing a style and inviting his readers in.
He also got significantly better at them (and indeed, at the whole thing) as he went on.
A thought: do you need to have read the book to write in this way about the first line? You could do an experiment in which you write your analysis, read the book, and then rewrite it...
I'm willing to do first sentences of books I haven't read, but I'm really not up for reading a whole book just so I can write a blog post about it; I have a one-year-old and my free time is far too limited!
Well, I can recommend Barnes, The Sense of an Ending - it's extremely brief, and also extremely gripping. First line (just in case) is one of those tricksy long ones - you can see it on Amazon 'search inside'. Begins: 'I remember, in no particular order:'
I find the opening sentence, and in fact the title and any dedications that appear, often relate to a major theme in the book. A god who both creates and destroys, who destroys something that would separate him from experiencing the world directly - I can find a relationship of that with the events in Pyramids.
The opening sentence of "Pyramids" stood out to me the first time I read the book, and has stayed with me since. The comedy value is of course obvious, but I find it immensely beautiful and poetic, too.
Thank you for this post. I never think about the whys of the opening sentences I read. Now that I am doing a review for "Sourcery", I went looking for info on it. This was fascinating.
مؤسسة مكافحة البعوض بنجرانPost a comment
أن حشرة البعوض من الحشرات القاتلة للإنسان فهي قد تصيبه في الطليعة بمرض يسمى التيفود وذلك الداء قد يكون السبب في وفاه الإنسان في أكثرية الأوقات، فتقوم مؤسسة مكافحة البعوض بنجران باستعمال مواد تقتل الحشرات أصلية للتخلص من تلك الحشرة.
كما وجود لدينا فريق عظيم يعمل بتقنية عالية في التداول مع مختلَف أشكال الحشرات، قد يجعلنا باستمرار في الصدارة ويجعل شركتنا أفضل اختيار للكثير من الزبائن.
فنحن نقدم كل الإجابات الممكنة للقضاء على الحشرات حتى نجعل عملائنا يعيشون في بيئة صحية وأمنه وخالية من الأمراض.
مؤسسة مكافحة حشرات بنجران
شركة مكافحة الصراصير بالرياض
شركة مكافحة فئران بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 March 2014