Home The Author The Book Reviews FAQs More Stuff The Other Side


RSS Feed 

Wednesday, December 21, 2011


Sourcery and Pyramids by Terry Pratchett

Julie Paradox put in a request for Sourcery, and then went for Pyramids instead. I thought it might be fun to do both together.

So, here's Sourcery:

There was a man and he had eight sons.

And here's Pyramids:

Nothing but stars, scattered across the blackness as though the Creator had smashed the windscreen of his car and hadn't bothered to sweep up the pieces.

Interestingly different, yet fundamentally similar sentences.

Sourcery's first sentence is bold in its simplicity. Not even stopping for a 'once upon a time', it goes straight into a direct, monosyllabic statement: 'There was a man.' We hear nothing of his name, place, character or life: his mere existence is the substance of a story. This is fairy-tale logic - especially when the sentence adds the number of sons - but fairy-tale stripped of its traditional 'once upon a time' flourish. Pared-down fairy-tale, in other words; down-to-earth fairy-tale; fairy-tale stripped down to common humanity. Pratchett often makes a theme of the ordinary man (and, less often, the ordinary woman), and this stylistic bluntness prepares the way: we are to see the mundane humanity in the context of the mythical.

There is no such bluntness in the opening of Pyramids. In terms of style, Pratchett is more or less showing off here with his bathetic bump from the epic drama of 'nothing but stars' to the sudden hop from the divine to the ridiculous - or at least to the quotidian. In positing a Creator with a windscreen, Pratchett asserts his characteristic style in which he helps himself to analogies that would be foreign to his characters, while also cocking a snook at reverence: a Creator who can't be bothered is a clear declaration that we are in a comic universe. The sentence is elaborately, almost heavy-handedly comedic, the kind of sentence a publisher very much hopes will grab the attention of a casual bookshop browser; it's also a sentence that quickly lays out the stall. We are reading a book aimed at a modern reader that will touch upon metaphysics with a gadfly lightness.

What can we see in common with these sentences? Well, one of the major commonalities is that they turn and look the reader in the eye. 'There was a man' is the writer informing rather than evoking; windscreens and Creators assure us that we'll be looking at the universe through, as it were, our own, human-eye-level windscreen. In both cases, the overriding tone is conspiratorial.

At the same time, their scope is broad: the audience may be our ordinary selves, and the universe may centre on equally ordinary people, but myths and divinity are not beyond our reach. In fact, far from being beyond our reach, they are being brought down to our level. We can accept that the existence of a mythical man is important without needing a 'Once upon a time' to ease us into it; we can laugh at a wild night sky with a careless Creator. Pratchett at once appeals to and flatters his audience's intelligence. The universe is a joke, and we will be in on it.

Terry Pratchett is an author who begins with bold sweeps, often starting in the heavens or ranging over a whole city or country before narrowing in on his central characters. Beginning with a sentence that grabs the readers' attention with its eccentricity is often a successful strategy, commercially as much as artistically (Iain Banks is a notable example), and a common feature is that the style tends to settle down once the story begins. There is a limit to how much you can tell readers about the actual events of the plot when you're in the realm of the mythic - or at least, there's a limit if you're going to make your story about ordinary people and tell it in a chatty, colloquial tone as Pratchett does.

As a result, Pratchett's opening sentences are often, in terms of storytelling, skippable. While they vary in content, they tend to have a single declaration: You are reading a Terry Pratchett novel. Humour, irreverence, metaphysics and myth are going to be featured, and we'll get to the plot in a minute. I said in my discussion of Jane Eyre that some books begin with a handshake, and Pratchett takes this a step further: in effect, his first sentences are secret handshakes. Open secrets, secrets that the reader can work out by getting the joke - as I said, one of Pratchett's main charms is that he makes the reader feel clever - but coded handshakes nonetheless. You shake the sentence's hand, and then you get admitted into the clubhouse.

I would note an interesting fact here: Pratchett is a writer who tends to elicit strong positive or negative reactions, and the negative reactors often plough down in the first few pages. The first couple of times I tried his books, this is how I reacted; I found the beginnings repetitive and mannered, and it was only when I persevered into the plot that I started enjoying it - and subsequently developed some appreciation of his openings. Other readers, I think, delight in the sense of 'Welcome back!' that his sentences create, the way they invite a sense of membership. Pratchett is an author unusually able to establish a sense of friendship with his readers - not necessarily in terms of how he behaves in person (though I get the impression he's a pretty friendly chap), but by establishing a style and inviting his readers in.

He also got significantly better at them (and indeed, at the whole thing) as he went on.
A thought: do you need to have read the book to write in this way about the first line? You could do an experiment in which you write your analysis, read the book, and then rewrite it...
I'm willing to do first sentences of books I haven't read, but I'm really not up for reading a whole book just so I can write a blog post about it; I have a one-year-old and my free time is far too limited!
Well, I can recommend Barnes, The Sense of an Ending - it's extremely brief, and also extremely gripping. First line (just in case) is one of those tricksy long ones - you can see it on Amazon 'search inside'. Begins: 'I remember, in no particular order:'
I find the opening sentence, and in fact the title and any dedications that appear, often relate to a major theme in the book. A god who both creates and destroys, who destroys something that would separate him from experiencing the world directly - I can find a relationship of that with the events in Pyramids.
The opening sentence of "Pyramids" stood out to me the first time I read the book, and has stayed with me since. The comedy value is of course obvious, but I find it immensely beautiful and poetic, too.
Thank you for this post. I never think about the whys of the opening sentences I read. Now that I am doing a review for "Sourcery", I went looking for info on it. This was fascinating.
مؤسسة مكافحة البعوض بنجران
أن حشرة البعوض من الحشرات القاتلة للإنسان فهي قد تصيبه في الطليعة بمرض يسمى التيفود وذلك الداء قد يكون السبب في وفاه الإنسان في أكثرية الأوقات، فتقوم مؤسسة مكافحة البعوض بنجران باستعمال مواد تقتل الحشرات أصلية للتخلص من تلك الحشرة.
كما وجود لدينا فريق عظيم يعمل بتقنية عالية في التداول مع مختلَف أشكال الحشرات، قد يجعلنا باستمرار في الصدارة ويجعل شركتنا أفضل اختيار للكثير من الزبائن.
فنحن نقدم كل الإجابات الممكنة للقضاء على الحشرات حتى نجعل عملائنا يعيشون في بيئة صحية وأمنه وخالية من الأمراض.
مؤسسة مكافحة حشرات بنجران
شركة مكافحة الصراصير بالرياض
شركة مكافحة فئران بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض

Post a Comment

<< Home


July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   March 2007   May 2007   July 2007   October 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   August 2010   September 2010   November 2010   January 2011   May 2011   June 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   August 2012   September 2012   October 2012   November 2012   December 2012   January 2013   March 2013   April 2013   May 2013   June 2013   July 2013   August 2013   September 2013   October 2013   March 2014   October 2021   June 2022  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?