![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Monday, March 07, 2011Hate crime
Okay, I've been quiet for a while. This is largely because I've been too lowered by birth trauma and busy looking after my lovely son to think of anything much to say - I'll try to talk more about that at some later date, perhaps - but in the meantime.
Consider this. (Be advised, it involves a photograph of a man's face with injuries.) Usama Alshaibi is the brother of a friend of a cyber-friend of mine, in one of those six-degrees connections. The other day he went to a party, and four men beat him so badly he wound up in hospital. Reason? His name was Usama. His family are asking for help with his legal and medical bills (he's in America, so those will be steep). Anyone who can, please consider supporting him.
Comments:
Kit -- thanks for posting about this.
I think people should take a look at the photograph if they can bear to -- because it is a picture of what hate speech means / does. I am pointing this out because I am heartily sick of being told that at the new Slacktivist site I can simply 'choose' to avoid the less palatable regions of the domain. In other words, I am being told to ignore hate speech as long as it isn't hurting me. That is like being told that I should ignore the hate-speech in the next room unless the bigots and the haters actually come into my room and beat someone up in front me. I cry "shame on you" to the all soi disant Christians involved in the administration of the site.
In other words, I am being told to ignore hate speech as long as it isn't hurting me.
For what it's worth, mmy, you have my sympathies.
By the way, mmy, your comment here has brought up some questions in my mind that I'm struggling with and would like your input, but I'd rather not clog up the comments on Kit's blog -- especially this post. Is there another public venue you use where we could chat?
Or if you prefer email, my address is in my blogger profile....
Hmph...Told to ignore hate speech not aimed at you? That's LITERALLY being told to not be compassionate (the etymology can look like "sharing feeling"). The rightwing and Randite put so much value on resilience, but to what end? Do they fear that if they allow themselves to partake of compassion, even to try to empathize with the stricken, they'll be likewise "infected" with "frailty"? Or that they'll just be distracted from something?
Post a Comment
<< Home ArchivesJuly 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 March 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |